I was in high school, shopping for new earphones with a single £20 note
as my budget, I used to dream of earbuds without the wire. It wasn’t a
complicated fantasy, just my ultra basic Sony buds sans fil, as
the French would put it. It took a decade and a half, but in 2016,
candidates like the Bragi Dash and Apple’s AirPods started surfacing,
each of them embodying some sort of physical compromise to accommodate a
battery, speaker, and wireless radio into the same tiny enclosure. The
wait kept going all the way until last month when Samsung unveiled its Galaxy Buds alongside the Galaxy S10 and Galaxy Fold reveal.
My dream earphones had arrived.
Buy From Amazon
The Galaxy Buds are the most forgettable true
wireless earbuds I’ve yet tried. I put them in, and they’re so light
that I can forget I’m wearing them. That can also be said of the
AirPods, except any nearby reflective surface will remind me of their
presence on my head. Samsung’s Buds are as slimmed down and discreet as
any earphones of this kind. Should you like them to be shouty, Samsung
also offers them in a canary yellow that matches the Galaxy S10E. That
physical minimalism extends to the Galaxy Buds case, which is the
smallest I’ve come across outside of the floss container that Apple
houses the AirPods in.
As if all of that good stuff wasn’t enough, Samsung also endows the Galaxy Buds with wireless charging
and prices them at $129.99, undercutting the AirPods. Anyone
preordering a Galaxy S10 or Galaxy Fold device gets a pair for free.
Well, it turns out that, in fact, the beautiful first impression that
these earbuds make isn’t enough. These are easily Samsung’s best true
wireless earphones, but they suffer from a few too many engineering
missteps to be considered a serious contender.
Samsung Galaxy Buds
Good Stuff
- Light, discreet, comfortable design
- Legit six-hour battery life
- Tiny case with wireless charging
- Better sound isolation than Apple’s AirPods
Bad Stuff
- Bass-shy sound doesn’t rise above average
- Flaky Bluetooth connectivity
- Poor microphone performance
The Galaxy Buds are capable of being two very different products. Get
them as a freebie with your Samsung phone, and you’ll be delighted.
They’ll perform to the best of their abilities, they’ll give you
AirPod-like instant pairing, and they won’t have cost you an extra
penny. But try using them with another Android phone, as I did, or with
an iPhone, and you’ll be less enthused. It’s a weird reversal of
traditional roles between Apple and Samsung: the AirPods maintain an
outstanding, hassle-free connection no matter what phone I hook them up to, whereas the Galaxy Buds are finicky and work best with Samsung hardware.
 |
| Samsung Galaxy Buds Image 1 |
In my testing, I tried using the Galaxy Buds with a Pixel
3 XL, and that pairing quickly devolved into a nightmare. I was
assaulted with a barrage of connection drop-offs and disconnects while
casually walking down the street with the phone in my pocket. No other
pair of wireless headphones has given me this much of a headache, but
Google’s had its own woes with Bluetooth in the past, so let’s call that
an unfortunate combination.
Things improve when I have the Galaxy Buds hooked up to
my MacBook Pro, but I still get an irritatingly frequent blip in the
connection between the two Buds. It’s just a half-second of only having
one bud playing, but even small foibles like that grow into big
annoyances over the course of hours of listening. My colleagues Dan
Seifert and Dieter Bohn have also experienced this latter type of
connection flakiness on other sets of Buds, including when they are
connected to a shiny new Galaxy S10.
 |
| Samsung Galaxy Buds Image 2 |
Irrespective of the device connected to the Galaxy Buds,
they exhibit unimpressive connection range and stability. This is
disappointing in light of how much work Samsung has put into the matter,
having developed its own scalable codec for audio transmission. Running
on a Broadcom chip,
the Galaxy Buds lack support for Qualcomm’s AptX or AptX HD, and
there’s no LDAC to be found here, either. Apple’s AAC is supported, but
that doesn’t help the Galaxy Buds keep up with video on an iPhone:
there’s an ugly and pervasive lag. That lag is less apparent on the
Google Pixel and entirely absent when watching anything on a Samsung
device.
Given these downsides, is there anything to salvage the
Galaxy Buds for a person not already in the Samsung ecosystem? Well,
there remain advantages to these earbuds that anyone can enjoy. The
comfort of the Galaxy Buds is seemingly everlasting, their touch
controls are quick and responsive, and they offer the best combo of
sound isolation and undemanding fit I’ve yet encountered among true
wireless buds. With the AirPods, Apple chose to make easy fit a
priority, losing sound isolation, while most other companies swing the
other way, accepting imperfect comfort as the trade-off for superior
noise isolation.
 |
| Samsung Galaxy Buds Image 3 |
Samsung also does better than I expected on the sound
front. Though I’m damning with faint praise here because I expected the
sound to be a deal-breaking disaster, the “sound by AKG” branding on the
case of these earphones seems to be for real. I definitely enjoy
listening to music on the Galaxy Buds — when they can keep it playing
without a wireless fault.
The one substantial weakness to the sound is a detectable
shortage of bass that makes music sound like a puddle: splashy and
shallow. It’s not in any way an offensive sound signature, but it’s far
from the thick, satisfying rumble of something like the Jabra Elite 65t or the Audio-Technica SPORT7TW. I’d say Samsung’s sound is acceptable, pushing at the upper limits of average.
Battery life is a strength for the Galaxy Buds, which
marks a major upgrade from the company’s first true wireless effort, the
Gear Icon earphones that lasted a feeble 1.5 hours. I never listened to
the Buds for the full advertised six hours at a stretch, but prolonged
listening sessions gave me battery readouts that were in line with
Samsung’s promise. Plus, the case’s seven-hour reserve tops the Buds up
quickly and refreshes the clock any time I store them away. This case
also accepts wireless charging, while being as light and diminutive as
it is, which I consider a minor engineering miracle.
Every Samsung flagship phone owner should have a wireless
charger by now, and 2019 will see many others making the switch, so
Galaxy Buds buyers probably won’t need to buy extra equipment just for
their earphones. (USB-C is the fallback wired charging option, in any
case.) With wireless charging, the convenience of just being able to
leave the Buds on a platform that keeps them permanently topped up is
not to be underestimated. It makes their 13 total hours of battery life
feel like more because you’ll rarely come close to draining both the
earphones and the case.
 |
| Samsung Galaxy Buds Image 4 |
Also worth noting about the Galaxy Buds case: outside of
the AirPods, this is the first time where I’ve unthinkingly put the case
for a pair of wireless earphones into my jeans pocket and headed out
the door. Samsung has managed to get under the threshold at which I
consider a case to be a thing I should carry in a backpack instead of a
pocket, and that’s an achievement in itself.
In equivocating about where to land with my conclusion on
these earbuds, I was ultimately swayed by their microphone performance.
They clearly have their pros and cons, and a great mic could have
tipped them over into the territory of a good product with forgivable
mistakes. Alas, the mic is pretty terrible. Samsung invested time and
money into this as well: the company put four microphones on its buds,
with two of them on the interior, designed to pick up the user’s voice
from inside their head. In test recordings I made with the Buds, there
was a fuzzy background noise that wasn’t picked up by the distinctly
average mic on my MacBook Pro, and my voice was thinned out and rendered
with an echo.
 |
| Samsung Galaxy Buds Image 5 |
The simplicity of my naive childhood dream of true
wireless earphones belies a huge raft of technical challenges that the
tech industry is still overcoming. Samsung’s Galaxy Buds are the latest
illustration of how hard it is to make a device in this category that’s
successful along every parameter, though they also show how fast
manufacturers are improving.
These are, by far, the most compact and unobtrusive true
wireless earphones I’ve tested, and I commend Samsung’s advances on the
miniaturization front. The things I saw and heard during CES this
January tell me that 2019 will be rich on more true wireless buds in the
same size and weight and battery-life class as Samsung’s Galaxy Buds.
And I suspect that, because they’ll be designed in a more universal
fashion rather than tailored to work best with one company’s hardware,
they’ll end up being better products in the end.
Samsung’s Galaxy Buds are probably the
best freebie that a company has ever bundled with a smartphone
preorder, but they fall significantly short of claiming the title of
best true wireless earbuds. Great for Samsung owners, but everyone else
should look elsewhere.
